Research before prototypes
FluidWick is a research-first exploration of porous materials for fluid uptake and controlled delivery. We narrow the technical, manufacturing, and IP uncertainties before committing to a prototype.
Current approach: research first. Physical testing follows a decision gate.
Traceable sourcesSupplier data and prior art inform the baseline.
Visible uncertaintyModel assumptions stay attached to the findings.
Permission to stopA no-go is a valid research outcome.
The MAP plan
Milestones, Actions, and Proof points: a practical route from desk research to a go/no-go review. Each stage produces a specific record—not just another task completed. Timings are planning estimates, not guarantees.
Weeks 1–2 · Research only
Start with what is known. Compile supplier data on pore size, pore volume, wettability, permeability, and manufacturing methods. Define representative fluid classes and review the closest patents and technical literature.
Proof point
A sourced material database, a fluid-characterization template, and a documented prior-art shortlist.
Weeks 2–4 · Research & calculations
Model capillary uptake, viscous flow, capacity, and discharge behavior. Examine how particle size and yield stress affect feasibility, then compare uniform-pore and graded-pore structures.
Proof point
Ranked material candidates, with assumptions and uncertainty explicitly recorded.
Weeks 4–5 · Research & expert review
Map proposed features against the closest patent claims. Check available material grades and manufacturing constraints, narrow the product scope, and exclude fluid classes that appear impractical.
Proof point
A written feasibility assessment and focused questions for a patent professional and material supplier.
Weeks 5–6 · Preparation only
Specify the minimum material samples and repeatable measurements for loading time, paint capacity, line length, line uniformity, and clogging. Set pass/fail criteria before ordering samples.
Proof point
An experimental protocol that can distinguish between the leading material candidates.
Week 7 onward · Decision gate
Review the research, manufacturing feasibility, IP risks, and estimated experimental costs. Only then decide whether to order samples and begin physical testing.
Proof point
A documented decision to proceed, revise the scope, or stop.
Before the first sample
A prototype is not the starting line. First, establish whether the material behavior, manufacturing options, IP questions, and experimental costs justify physical testing.
Review the experiment plan